27 Mei 13:50
Kaapstad Verander Area

Saterdag

17°C / 12°C

Wind 13km/h

Reënval 0

Humiditeit 73%

Sondag

18°C / 12°C

Wind 15km/h

Reënval 0

Humiditeit 70%

Maandag

20°C / 12°C

Wind 11km/h

Reënval 0

Humiditeit 55%

Dinsdag

21°C / 14°C

Wind 8km/h

Reënval 0

Humiditeit 49%

Woensdag

20°C / 13°C

Wind 11km/h

Reënval 0

Humiditeit 57%

Donderdag

20°C / 14°C

Wind 17km/h

Reënval 0

Humiditeit 56%

Nuus
Time bar is enforceable

Question: My company concluded a contract with a supply company to supply us with imported tiles. Given their reason-able price we bought a large shipment of the tiles. About nine months later we discovered that a large number of the tiles were broken.

We approached the supply company to replace the tiles, but they refused, insisting that our contract stated that we had to notify them of any defects or damage to the tiles within six months of delivery.

Surely they cannot rely on such a clause when they in fact delivered broken tiles?

Answer: In general our law on prescription governs the period within which claims expire.

That being said, our law of contract does allow parties broad freedom regarding various aspects of their relationship, including specific time frames for actions to be performed by parties.

It has developed over time that contracts often contain time bar clauses which impose a time period within which a party must give notice to the other regarding disputes or dissatisfaction, failing which the right to claim relief lapses. A time bar clause in effect replaces the periods specified by our law on prescription and that would normally apply to such a claim.

The inclusion of such a clause is intended to provide certainty in specific circumstances, although these clauses can also hold onerous consequences for a party.

Our courts acknowledge that time bar clauses are enforceable, provided the notice period is clear and reasonable under the circumstances.

The courts may also look carefully at the wording of the clause to determine whether the clause excludes both delictual as well as contractual claims.

It may be that the wording of the clause is such that not all claims are excluded by the specific wording.

In your case it does appear that as you failed to provide the required notice to the supplier, the time bar clause will apply.

The period also does not appear to be unreasonable. Whether all your remedies have been excluded can only be determined on a closer reading of the specific contract and clause.

  • We advise you to consult an attorney to assist you in reviewing the contract and advise you on the merits of your case. Mulalo Muthelo, associate, Phatshoane Henney Attorneys
MyStem: Het jy meer op die hart?

Stuur jou mening van 300 woorde of minder na MyStem@netwerk24.com en ons sal dit vir publikasie oorweeg. Onthou om jou naam en van, ‘n kop-en-skouers foto en jou dorp of stad in te sluit.

Ons kommentaarbeleid

Netwerk24 ondersteun ‘n intelligente, oop gesprek en waardeer sinvolle bydraes deur ons lesers. Lewer hier kommentaar wat relevant is tot die onderwerp van die artikel. Jou mening is vir ons belangrik en kan verdere menings of ondersoeke stimuleer. Geldige kritiek en meningsverskille is aanvaarbaar, maar hierdie is nie ‘n platform vir haatspraak of persoonlike aanvalle nie. Kommentaar wat irrelevant, onnodig aggressief of beledigend is, sal verwyder word. Lees ons volledige kommentaarbeleid hier

Kontak Klik Hier

NETWERK24 Stemme

Hallo, jy moet ingeteken wees of registreer om artikels te lees.